I guess this is a wrestling blog now...
Big news about CM Punk this morning. Before I get too far, I want to do an awful job of crediting sources. I follow Matt Fowler and David Shoemaker on Twitter, so whatever wrestling rumors or backstage news I read comes from one of those two. There are occasional retweets from Cageside Seats or just friends who caught wind of something before I did, but I'll still go back to one of those two for confirmation. That said, whatever information I present here... I read or heard from one of the sources above.
This morning was one of those times. I saw a tweet from someone talking about CM Punk, so I tracked down Fowler's site to see what was up. Here's what I've been able to gather:
The rumor coming out of Monday was that RAW had been rewritten at the last minute. While it might be normal for minor changes to get written in throughout the day, apparently this was going into the final couple of hours before air and there was still a lot undecided. That is unusual. Rumor being this was because of the fan reaction at the Rumble, which was supposedly unexpected. CM Punk was said to have been written off the show to sell his encounter with Kane at the Rumble.
Then new rumor came out saying that CM Punk actually walked off of RAW and told Vince he was going home. Which is why he wasn't on the show. It has since been speculated the rewrites were done because of this, and not because of the reactions to the Rumble. CM Punk was reportedly removed from all upcoming WWE events. Latest "confirmed" rumor being that he has quit the company. I even saw a tweet that said WWE had unfollowed Punk on Twitter. And it doesn't get more official than that...
So it looks like CM Punk is gone. Questions of course arise about whether this is a work or real. And because a couple people did ask, and I've got shit to do at work right now... here's my (not quite) unsolicited opinion based on what I know.
First and foremost, it's not a big deal. The WWE product will roll on without CM Punk. And don't get me wrong, I love CM Punk. He's a fantastic wrestler. He's great on the mic. He does the little things, the small gestures and facial expressions, that a lot of other wrestlers don't seem to think about. Punk is a total package dude. I've been a big fan of his since he debuted in that shell of a show called ECW. He's my favorite wrestler on the current roster, well, I guess he WAS. Without contest. If you asked me to pick a dude right now, he's the dude I'd pick. But he hasn't been relevant since he lost the title to The Rock. He's done nothing of significance. No doubt part of the reason he quit, I'm sure. But the product will not suffer with him gone. In fact, nothing noticeable will even change.
Now it's possible this is a work. Punk did something similar a few years ago when his contract was up (his contract would have been up in July of this year). Back when he dropped that pipe bomb and beat Cena for the title on the night his contract expired. He took a short break, showed up at a comic convention to taunt Triple H, and came back to huge applause. It was a big deal. It was a cool angle. It worked.
So maybe they're going for a second time. But if the WWE is doing this again, the week after the Royal Rumble... ugh. If the WWE's new thing is just pissing the fans off, then... man, I can't back that. That's just bullshit.
Let me sidetrack and talk about the Rumble for a minute. First of all, that was a solid PPV. The Bray Wyatt/Daniel Bryan match was outstanding. Little slow at first, but really took off. The Lesnar/Show match was... meh. Who cares? It was what it was. I didn't give a shit about the angle, so no matter how the match turned out, I didn't care. It was fine. And the Orton/Cena match was, considering the participants, quite good. I feel like it followed a similar pacing to the opening match, but otherwise, it turned out well. Could have been much worse. Hell, those two have done much worse. So of the three matches on the card, all three delivered.
Then there's the Rumble. Which was entertaining. It's entertaining every year. It can't NOT be entertaining. But boy did the fans shit on it.
The live crowd there wanted nothing to do with an Orton/Cena match, and had no problem vocalizing that. It's been the new thing to do now. And I'm fine with it. It's fun. It gets a point across. The fans want a change. The fans want to see something different. Orton and Cena facing off for the title is not different. Batista getting a title shot and the chance to headline Wrestlemania is not different. It's the same thing we've seen for a decade or more. Even Rey Mysterio took a big brunt of that. Dude got booed out of the building just for not being Daniel Bryan. I'm not even a big Rey fan, and I felt bad for him. He didn't deserve that. Since he's entered the WWE, he's slowly adopted more and more of that WWE 5 Moves of Doom style and lost all the things that made me love him back in ECW/WCW. Which, whatever. He's getting older. His legs are shot. He can't do that stuff anymore. I get that. I'm not blasting him. But he's another dude we've seen time and time again for the past decade. And he came out, dashing all hopes of Bryan being in the Rumble. And the crowd devoured him for it.
It's unfortunate that WWE sacrificed Rey like that. They had to have seen that coming. Now, in their defense, I can understand not putting Bryan in the Rumble. Because leaving him out is leaving him out. Putting him in and having him lose? There's no real excuse for that. If he was in the match, with his popularity, he would have had to have won. There's no way around that. Him not winning would have been so much worse. And, sure, I bet they could have found something to do storyline wise to get him eliminated, but this was easier. I cautiously support their decision, assuming that they have a better plan for him going into Wrestlemania. If they don't... well, fuck, but I'm hoping they do.
But the exclusion of Bryan from the Rumble, whether it was originally intended to be or not, came off as a slight to the fans. The people wanted to see him. They didn't get to see him. They were pissed. Now, again, I'll back the WWE on their call, but the crowd response is what it is. So then we get Triple H coming out Monday night and mocking it. Mocking us. So whether it was intentional or not, it's being played like it is now. And... I'm not a fan of it. I hate this idea that WWE is taking jabs at the fans to get a response. Because I believe there's a fine but important difference between... Urk. Words.
OK. So on the one hand, we have traditional wrestling. Two men come out and fight for whatever reason. I have an emotional investment in this. I like one of these men as a performer or character. Or perhaps I just relate to the particular circumstances of this angle. It's not that different from watching a movie. There's an antagonist and a protagonist. I pick a side, depending on who I like or agree with, and I want to see that side beat the other side. I watch because I want that person to get their revenge. I want to see that person come out victorious and right the wrongs. And even in the case, in wrestling, where a heel comes out and calls the crowd stupid or inbred or whatnot, it's part of the show. It's just for heat. You know that. I know that. It doesn't feel personal. The heel might be looking at me at this moment, but his real feud is with the other dude. The fight is with the other man in the ring. That's where all the focus is. That's what it's about.
On the other hand, we have this new thing. Daniel Bryan is excluded from the Royal Rumble, despite the fans cheering for him almost literally the whole night. We, as fans, are deprived of a thing we wanted and expected to see. The WWE, for whatever reason, intentionally denied us. Which I'm fine with. Up to that point. Then Triple H comes out and mocks us. He is, in essence, taking responsibility for the slight. Which means that this is a feud between us and Triple H now. He's the one who took something I thought I deserved. It's now become personal, because the action has been done to me. In this case, in this new thing that's happening, I'm now part of the storyline. I'm the one who's been wronged. I'm the one who's been slighted. In the traditional sense, I would be the one out for revenge. I would be the one fighting to right the wrong. But I'm not a wrestler. I'm a fan. I have no recourse for righting anything. I'm not an actual participant. I can't fight Triple H. I can't get back at Triple H.
And right on the heels of that, we have this CM Punk thing. Which, if it is a work, is just a modified version of what happened at the Rumble. The WWE has found something that I like, something that I give them money to see, and taken it away. If this is all fake, and it's all leading up to Punk coming back bigger and better and getting a huge reaction and taking the fight to the man, then... ugh. It's still the WWE just fucking with me. On purpose. The WWE is just being a douche because they can and I can't conceivably do anything about it. Hell, even if I did quit watching wrestling, it's not like a billion other people would. So it doesn't matter. The WWE is picking a fight with me and I don't even have the means to fight back, let alone win. That is essentially the definition of a victim. The WWE is bullying me, and I am the victim.
That shit is beyond fucking irritating. It is above and beyond my biggest issue with the WWE and the way it has represented certain things lately. And if this CM Punk thing is all just another purple nurple on the sad road of WWE bullying me and stuffing me in lockers where I can't see Daniel Bryan, just because it's bigger and richer than me and it can, I'm gonna be pissed.
Now, let's assume this isn't a work, that it's not part of some grand angle for a "surprise" CM Punk return. In that case... he has a valid point.
From what I've read, Punk hasn't been too pleased with things since he lost the title. He made some comments last week in Portland, I think, about how he sort of just goes out, does what he's told, and then gets the hell out. And alluded that he wasn't a fan of the current product. Essentially, he doesn't like his job right now. I can relate to that. I bet you can, too.
It's not a secret that he was upset with The Rock coming in the past couple Wrestlemanias and stealing a spot that should have gone to someone else. There's a lot of rumor that Punk has an ego. That he thinks he should be headlining Wrestlemania instead of Batista or that The Rock took his spot, specifically. Perhaps.
The principle of that argument is universal, though. CM Punk works his ass off all year long. He's been open on Twitter about how he hates the grueling WWE schedule. But he's out there doing it. Every. Damn. Day. And then Batista rolls in, not having been in a wrestling ring for four years, and gets a guaranteed main event at Wrestlemania.
On that same card, it's practically guaranteed The Undertaker will be back for his annual appearance. There are strong rumors that Hogan has signed a deal to do... something. Not wrestle. But he'll be involved in an angle of some sort. And whatever he's involved in is going to be a big deal. And his involvement is going to overshadow the actual angle, whatever that ends up being. There was supposed to be a Punk/HHH match on that card as well. Triple H, who isn't a regular wrestler, but does come out for two or three matches a year. Not to mention Brock Lesnar, who is essentially part-time, but will most likely have a match at Mania (rumor right now being against Undertaker).
So that's Batista and probably Undertaker for sure, with Triple H and Brock Lesnar more or less a lock, to have matches at Wrestlemania. That's four spots on the card that could have gone to someone busting their ass on the full-time roster. And if the Hogan rumor comes true, that's a match that will be overshadowed by his participation, lessening the spotlight on another two (at least) full-time wrestlers.
That's a serious problem. Wrestlemania is THE show. That's the big event. That's the one wrestlers aspire to. The whole point of going out and doing four shows a week (or whatever the WWE schedule is), of traveling all over the world, of all the promotional ads and interviews and appearances, of being a cog in the whole WWE machine, is to get a spot on Wrestlemania. Ideally, to make the main event. But even to just get a match on the card...
And there's four fewer spots now, reserved for dudes that didn't earn it.
Before the arguments roll in about how those dudes paid their dues and busted their ass and earned their spots on the card a long time ago... you're absolutely right. Triple H and Undertaker and Brock Lesnar and Batista and Hulk Hogan and if they get Sting or Jake the Snake or whoever else, all worked just as hard as the full-time roster does right now. Every one of those men paid his dues and worked that grueling schedule, busting his ass every single night of the week to become a top performer, to earn a spot on Wrestlemania.
And every single one of them got a spot on Wrestlemania. Multiple times. In main events. When those dudes were full-time, when they put in the work, they were rewarded. Now we have a new crop of stars that are busting their asses and paying dues and putting in the work... and their spots on Wrestlemania are being stolen by men who long ago had the chance to shine, and did so.
If this is what CM Punk was mad about, then I agree with him. 100%.
As a fan, I don't care that Batista won the Rumble. I don't care that Batista's going to the main event of Wrestlemania. I don't want to see that, but it's one match on the card. And there will be other things on the card I do want to see. Even some of those old timers' matches, perhaps. So as a dude on a couch, whatever.
But as an average person, as someone who goes to a job and works hard (well, not now, but I used to before I got jaded), as someone who has seen undeserving people advanced time and again over people who have toiled and busted their asses... Fuck Batista. Fuck WWE.
If I was Punk, I wouldn't want to work there either. And I don't blame him for leaving. It's bullshit.
It was thought that Punk was building up to a match with Triple H at Wrestlemania. The fighting with Kane, the New Age Outlaws turning on him, all of it leading up to an eventual confrontation with Hunter himself. Which I'm sure grated on Punk, once again getting put in a match with someone who didn't work and earn a spot on the card. But whatever. It seemed like a good angle and it gets Punk on the card, right?
Sure. Other rumors, which contribute to me being less upset about the outcome of the Rumble, were that The Undertaker wanted to face Daniel Bryan at Wrestlemania (which would have been amazing). More recent rumors put Bryan up against Sheamus.
But today, now, and there was certainly a bit of set-up on Monday, it looks like Bryan will be taking Punk's spot against Triple H.
Um... what?
Look, I get that the match makes sense. It's even a better fit than Punk.
BUT
If that wasn't the plan before, and it is the plan now, then that just proves the exact (supposed) mentality Punk (supposedly) has issue with.
Triple H isn't a full-time wrestler. There's no reason for us to expect him to be on the Wrestlemania card. He doesn't wrestle. I don't think there is a big portion of the WWE audience that even wants to see him wrestle on the card. Would I mind if he did? Eh. No. Do I want to see it? Eh. No. Would I rather see someone else? Yes. Absolutely.
So if the original plan was for Triple H to face CM Punk, and CM Punk is now gone... why not just scrap the match and not have Hunter on the card at all? Isn't that the easiest thing to do? One man leaves, his match is removed from the card, and everything else can go on according to plan.
Changing the plan is just like knocking over dominos. I agree, it makes more sense for Bryan to face Triple H. The story is there, so there's no work involved setting it up. Fine. That part's easy. But now Sheamus (going with the last rumor I read) doesn't have a match on the card. And Sheamus is kind of a big deal, so he'll need a kind of big deal opponent. Which probably means they have to steal someone (Lesnar, Show, Del Rio) from a different planned match. Which leaves someone else without an opponent. And on and on until we hit someone like Ziggler or Kofi. Someone the WWE doesn't care about investing in. And then that dude is off the card.
All so Triple H can have yet another high profile match at Wrestlemania.
Yep. That's exactly the kind of boss I'd want to work for.
Fuck. I don't think I could walk out of that place fast enough.
Godspeed, Punk.
Big news about CM Punk this morning. Before I get too far, I want to do an awful job of crediting sources. I follow Matt Fowler and David Shoemaker on Twitter, so whatever wrestling rumors or backstage news I read comes from one of those two. There are occasional retweets from Cageside Seats or just friends who caught wind of something before I did, but I'll still go back to one of those two for confirmation. That said, whatever information I present here... I read or heard from one of the sources above.
This morning was one of those times. I saw a tweet from someone talking about CM Punk, so I tracked down Fowler's site to see what was up. Here's what I've been able to gather:
The rumor coming out of Monday was that RAW had been rewritten at the last minute. While it might be normal for minor changes to get written in throughout the day, apparently this was going into the final couple of hours before air and there was still a lot undecided. That is unusual. Rumor being this was because of the fan reaction at the Rumble, which was supposedly unexpected. CM Punk was said to have been written off the show to sell his encounter with Kane at the Rumble.
Then new rumor came out saying that CM Punk actually walked off of RAW and told Vince he was going home. Which is why he wasn't on the show. It has since been speculated the rewrites were done because of this, and not because of the reactions to the Rumble. CM Punk was reportedly removed from all upcoming WWE events. Latest "confirmed" rumor being that he has quit the company. I even saw a tweet that said WWE had unfollowed Punk on Twitter. And it doesn't get more official than that...
So it looks like CM Punk is gone. Questions of course arise about whether this is a work or real. And because a couple people did ask, and I've got shit to do at work right now... here's my (not quite) unsolicited opinion based on what I know.
First and foremost, it's not a big deal. The WWE product will roll on without CM Punk. And don't get me wrong, I love CM Punk. He's a fantastic wrestler. He's great on the mic. He does the little things, the small gestures and facial expressions, that a lot of other wrestlers don't seem to think about. Punk is a total package dude. I've been a big fan of his since he debuted in that shell of a show called ECW. He's my favorite wrestler on the current roster, well, I guess he WAS. Without contest. If you asked me to pick a dude right now, he's the dude I'd pick. But he hasn't been relevant since he lost the title to The Rock. He's done nothing of significance. No doubt part of the reason he quit, I'm sure. But the product will not suffer with him gone. In fact, nothing noticeable will even change.
Now it's possible this is a work. Punk did something similar a few years ago when his contract was up (his contract would have been up in July of this year). Back when he dropped that pipe bomb and beat Cena for the title on the night his contract expired. He took a short break, showed up at a comic convention to taunt Triple H, and came back to huge applause. It was a big deal. It was a cool angle. It worked.
So maybe they're going for a second time. But if the WWE is doing this again, the week after the Royal Rumble... ugh. If the WWE's new thing is just pissing the fans off, then... man, I can't back that. That's just bullshit.
Let me sidetrack and talk about the Rumble for a minute. First of all, that was a solid PPV. The Bray Wyatt/Daniel Bryan match was outstanding. Little slow at first, but really took off. The Lesnar/Show match was... meh. Who cares? It was what it was. I didn't give a shit about the angle, so no matter how the match turned out, I didn't care. It was fine. And the Orton/Cena match was, considering the participants, quite good. I feel like it followed a similar pacing to the opening match, but otherwise, it turned out well. Could have been much worse. Hell, those two have done much worse. So of the three matches on the card, all three delivered.
Then there's the Rumble. Which was entertaining. It's entertaining every year. It can't NOT be entertaining. But boy did the fans shit on it.
The live crowd there wanted nothing to do with an Orton/Cena match, and had no problem vocalizing that. It's been the new thing to do now. And I'm fine with it. It's fun. It gets a point across. The fans want a change. The fans want to see something different. Orton and Cena facing off for the title is not different. Batista getting a title shot and the chance to headline Wrestlemania is not different. It's the same thing we've seen for a decade or more. Even Rey Mysterio took a big brunt of that. Dude got booed out of the building just for not being Daniel Bryan. I'm not even a big Rey fan, and I felt bad for him. He didn't deserve that. Since he's entered the WWE, he's slowly adopted more and more of that WWE 5 Moves of Doom style and lost all the things that made me love him back in ECW/WCW. Which, whatever. He's getting older. His legs are shot. He can't do that stuff anymore. I get that. I'm not blasting him. But he's another dude we've seen time and time again for the past decade. And he came out, dashing all hopes of Bryan being in the Rumble. And the crowd devoured him for it.
It's unfortunate that WWE sacrificed Rey like that. They had to have seen that coming. Now, in their defense, I can understand not putting Bryan in the Rumble. Because leaving him out is leaving him out. Putting him in and having him lose? There's no real excuse for that. If he was in the match, with his popularity, he would have had to have won. There's no way around that. Him not winning would have been so much worse. And, sure, I bet they could have found something to do storyline wise to get him eliminated, but this was easier. I cautiously support their decision, assuming that they have a better plan for him going into Wrestlemania. If they don't... well, fuck, but I'm hoping they do.
But the exclusion of Bryan from the Rumble, whether it was originally intended to be or not, came off as a slight to the fans. The people wanted to see him. They didn't get to see him. They were pissed. Now, again, I'll back the WWE on their call, but the crowd response is what it is. So then we get Triple H coming out Monday night and mocking it. Mocking us. So whether it was intentional or not, it's being played like it is now. And... I'm not a fan of it. I hate this idea that WWE is taking jabs at the fans to get a response. Because I believe there's a fine but important difference between... Urk. Words.
OK. So on the one hand, we have traditional wrestling. Two men come out and fight for whatever reason. I have an emotional investment in this. I like one of these men as a performer or character. Or perhaps I just relate to the particular circumstances of this angle. It's not that different from watching a movie. There's an antagonist and a protagonist. I pick a side, depending on who I like or agree with, and I want to see that side beat the other side. I watch because I want that person to get their revenge. I want to see that person come out victorious and right the wrongs. And even in the case, in wrestling, where a heel comes out and calls the crowd stupid or inbred or whatnot, it's part of the show. It's just for heat. You know that. I know that. It doesn't feel personal. The heel might be looking at me at this moment, but his real feud is with the other dude. The fight is with the other man in the ring. That's where all the focus is. That's what it's about.
On the other hand, we have this new thing. Daniel Bryan is excluded from the Royal Rumble, despite the fans cheering for him almost literally the whole night. We, as fans, are deprived of a thing we wanted and expected to see. The WWE, for whatever reason, intentionally denied us. Which I'm fine with. Up to that point. Then Triple H comes out and mocks us. He is, in essence, taking responsibility for the slight. Which means that this is a feud between us and Triple H now. He's the one who took something I thought I deserved. It's now become personal, because the action has been done to me. In this case, in this new thing that's happening, I'm now part of the storyline. I'm the one who's been wronged. I'm the one who's been slighted. In the traditional sense, I would be the one out for revenge. I would be the one fighting to right the wrong. But I'm not a wrestler. I'm a fan. I have no recourse for righting anything. I'm not an actual participant. I can't fight Triple H. I can't get back at Triple H.
And right on the heels of that, we have this CM Punk thing. Which, if it is a work, is just a modified version of what happened at the Rumble. The WWE has found something that I like, something that I give them money to see, and taken it away. If this is all fake, and it's all leading up to Punk coming back bigger and better and getting a huge reaction and taking the fight to the man, then... ugh. It's still the WWE just fucking with me. On purpose. The WWE is just being a douche because they can and I can't conceivably do anything about it. Hell, even if I did quit watching wrestling, it's not like a billion other people would. So it doesn't matter. The WWE is picking a fight with me and I don't even have the means to fight back, let alone win. That is essentially the definition of a victim. The WWE is bullying me, and I am the victim.
That shit is beyond fucking irritating. It is above and beyond my biggest issue with the WWE and the way it has represented certain things lately. And if this CM Punk thing is all just another purple nurple on the sad road of WWE bullying me and stuffing me in lockers where I can't see Daniel Bryan, just because it's bigger and richer than me and it can, I'm gonna be pissed.
Now, let's assume this isn't a work, that it's not part of some grand angle for a "surprise" CM Punk return. In that case... he has a valid point.
From what I've read, Punk hasn't been too pleased with things since he lost the title. He made some comments last week in Portland, I think, about how he sort of just goes out, does what he's told, and then gets the hell out. And alluded that he wasn't a fan of the current product. Essentially, he doesn't like his job right now. I can relate to that. I bet you can, too.
It's not a secret that he was upset with The Rock coming in the past couple Wrestlemanias and stealing a spot that should have gone to someone else. There's a lot of rumor that Punk has an ego. That he thinks he should be headlining Wrestlemania instead of Batista or that The Rock took his spot, specifically. Perhaps.
The principle of that argument is universal, though. CM Punk works his ass off all year long. He's been open on Twitter about how he hates the grueling WWE schedule. But he's out there doing it. Every. Damn. Day. And then Batista rolls in, not having been in a wrestling ring for four years, and gets a guaranteed main event at Wrestlemania.
On that same card, it's practically guaranteed The Undertaker will be back for his annual appearance. There are strong rumors that Hogan has signed a deal to do... something. Not wrestle. But he'll be involved in an angle of some sort. And whatever he's involved in is going to be a big deal. And his involvement is going to overshadow the actual angle, whatever that ends up being. There was supposed to be a Punk/HHH match on that card as well. Triple H, who isn't a regular wrestler, but does come out for two or three matches a year. Not to mention Brock Lesnar, who is essentially part-time, but will most likely have a match at Mania (rumor right now being against Undertaker).
So that's Batista and probably Undertaker for sure, with Triple H and Brock Lesnar more or less a lock, to have matches at Wrestlemania. That's four spots on the card that could have gone to someone busting their ass on the full-time roster. And if the Hogan rumor comes true, that's a match that will be overshadowed by his participation, lessening the spotlight on another two (at least) full-time wrestlers.
That's a serious problem. Wrestlemania is THE show. That's the big event. That's the one wrestlers aspire to. The whole point of going out and doing four shows a week (or whatever the WWE schedule is), of traveling all over the world, of all the promotional ads and interviews and appearances, of being a cog in the whole WWE machine, is to get a spot on Wrestlemania. Ideally, to make the main event. But even to just get a match on the card...
And there's four fewer spots now, reserved for dudes that didn't earn it.
Before the arguments roll in about how those dudes paid their dues and busted their ass and earned their spots on the card a long time ago... you're absolutely right. Triple H and Undertaker and Brock Lesnar and Batista and Hulk Hogan and if they get Sting or Jake the Snake or whoever else, all worked just as hard as the full-time roster does right now. Every one of those men paid his dues and worked that grueling schedule, busting his ass every single night of the week to become a top performer, to earn a spot on Wrestlemania.
And every single one of them got a spot on Wrestlemania. Multiple times. In main events. When those dudes were full-time, when they put in the work, they were rewarded. Now we have a new crop of stars that are busting their asses and paying dues and putting in the work... and their spots on Wrestlemania are being stolen by men who long ago had the chance to shine, and did so.
If this is what CM Punk was mad about, then I agree with him. 100%.
As a fan, I don't care that Batista won the Rumble. I don't care that Batista's going to the main event of Wrestlemania. I don't want to see that, but it's one match on the card. And there will be other things on the card I do want to see. Even some of those old timers' matches, perhaps. So as a dude on a couch, whatever.
But as an average person, as someone who goes to a job and works hard (well, not now, but I used to before I got jaded), as someone who has seen undeserving people advanced time and again over people who have toiled and busted their asses... Fuck Batista. Fuck WWE.
If I was Punk, I wouldn't want to work there either. And I don't blame him for leaving. It's bullshit.
It was thought that Punk was building up to a match with Triple H at Wrestlemania. The fighting with Kane, the New Age Outlaws turning on him, all of it leading up to an eventual confrontation with Hunter himself. Which I'm sure grated on Punk, once again getting put in a match with someone who didn't work and earn a spot on the card. But whatever. It seemed like a good angle and it gets Punk on the card, right?
Sure. Other rumors, which contribute to me being less upset about the outcome of the Rumble, were that The Undertaker wanted to face Daniel Bryan at Wrestlemania (which would have been amazing). More recent rumors put Bryan up against Sheamus.
But today, now, and there was certainly a bit of set-up on Monday, it looks like Bryan will be taking Punk's spot against Triple H.
Um... what?
Look, I get that the match makes sense. It's even a better fit than Punk.
BUT
If that wasn't the plan before, and it is the plan now, then that just proves the exact (supposed) mentality Punk (supposedly) has issue with.
Triple H isn't a full-time wrestler. There's no reason for us to expect him to be on the Wrestlemania card. He doesn't wrestle. I don't think there is a big portion of the WWE audience that even wants to see him wrestle on the card. Would I mind if he did? Eh. No. Do I want to see it? Eh. No. Would I rather see someone else? Yes. Absolutely.
So if the original plan was for Triple H to face CM Punk, and CM Punk is now gone... why not just scrap the match and not have Hunter on the card at all? Isn't that the easiest thing to do? One man leaves, his match is removed from the card, and everything else can go on according to plan.
Changing the plan is just like knocking over dominos. I agree, it makes more sense for Bryan to face Triple H. The story is there, so there's no work involved setting it up. Fine. That part's easy. But now Sheamus (going with the last rumor I read) doesn't have a match on the card. And Sheamus is kind of a big deal, so he'll need a kind of big deal opponent. Which probably means they have to steal someone (Lesnar, Show, Del Rio) from a different planned match. Which leaves someone else without an opponent. And on and on until we hit someone like Ziggler or Kofi. Someone the WWE doesn't care about investing in. And then that dude is off the card.
All so Triple H can have yet another high profile match at Wrestlemania.
Yep. That's exactly the kind of boss I'd want to work for.
Fuck. I don't think I could walk out of that place fast enough.
Godspeed, Punk.