I don't have much for this, but there were a few points I wanted to throw down, so we should be through this quick. The movie's good. Not great, but good. It's good enough to be a starting point for something more if DC can get their heads out of their collective ass and make it happen. Though I fear that this will be done in a rush and we'll end up with a lot of shit over the next couple of summers. The downside to DC being so far behind Marvel is that an attempt to do the Justice League movie will have to be done before the inevitable burst of this superhero movie bubble. That means fast-tracking things that should be done with precision and care. We'll see what comes of it.
I had a friend who said he preferred Iron Man 3 to Man of Steel and I think I felt the opposite, which is weird because I don't much care for Superman. That could have something to do with it, though. I was much more invested in Iron Man 3 than I was in Man of Steel, so it's possible that the inconsistencies of the former would bother me more than the latter. Perhaps.
And now, bullet points... (sorta)
-It's too damn long. There had to be some edits that could have gotten this down closer to two hours. The problem with the final fight was that we all knew it was coming. Of course it was. That's how these movies are structured. Prolonging the fight or doing some half-assed fake out is pointless. We all know Superman vs Zod is going to close out the show. The longer the movie goes on, the less we care and the more we just want to see the thing we know is coming. Other downside to a Superman movie is that Superman fights tend to be more or less the same thing. Packing in a couple long ass fights gives us a chance to see a lot of cool stuff, but it also gives us more chances to see a lot of the same stuff (that stuff being punching). The fight in Smallville could have been trimmed down a couple of minutes, at least, and still had the same essential effect. Well, most of the fights. Superman vs the World Engine. The struggle to turn on the escape pod so it could be used as a bomb. All of these things could have been trimmed, and we would have gotten the exact same movie with less "cool" stuff in it.
-Speaking of Zod, Michael Shannon seemed a lot less evil than I expected. Though I get that his character wasn't "evil," at least not from a certain point of view, but he was the antagonist. He was ruthless, and I expected more overall menace from him. Seemed like three-quarters of the time he was just going with the flow, not all that interested, and then the other quarter he cranks up the Insane-O-Meter to a rockin' 11. Those parts are awesome. The other parts were kinda dull.
-Jor-El was a badass. This is not a bad thing. But after that opening, I did kinda hope it was just going to be a whole movie of Jor-El kicking ass on Krypton.
-Lois should have kissed Superman. It doesn't seem to make sense for Supers to lead into it, too. I'm all for him joining in if she initiates, but it seemed weird for him to make the move first, or for them to do it at the same time, as he hadn't seemed too interested before that. There were a couple of spots, but most of the movie was Lois Lane being all school girl crush on the hot quarterback. Superman was... preoccupied. And it didn't seem like Clark had spent a lot of time with the ladies in his travels, so I'm guessing he's not all that suave or smooth. Just seems far more plausible that a strong, independent woman like Lois would make the first move and then Superman would be like, "This is cool" and join in.
-I liked this Lois Lane. Aside from Jor-El, she seemed to be the most interesting person in the movie. Up until closer to the end when she just turned into helpless woman falling out of an airplane.
-The ending. Gods damn this ending. Despite some minor grips, I was on board with this one until the end. It was more or less the movie I expected, and that's a good thing. It wasn't disappointing. Until the end. I bitched about this with Iron Man 3, and I'm going to again here... superheroes need to stop murdering people. It's fine for Wolverine and Punisher because that's what those dudes do. It's part of their schtick. And it serves a purpose, to some degree, of informing their character and their motivations. This is not true for most superheroes, who tend to avoid murdering villains because it's crossing a line into villainous terrain. Murder is wrong. We all know that. Now this isn't Superman's fault. He was written into a corner. But there were still other options. Superman could have blocked Zod's heat vision with his own hand. Or could have flown them both up into space or some remote area of the world where innocent victims would not be an issue. He could have even just turned Zod's head to redirect the heat vision, as opposed to turning it 360 degrees to snap his gods damn neck. Even within the scene itself, there were other options. But that scene didn't have to happen. There were an infinite numbers of possibilities for an ending to this movie. And even if Zod had to die, there could have been the self-inflicted death (ala Green Goblin in the first Raimi Spider-Man movie) or something akin to Liam Neeson's death in Batman Begins. Not that Superman should have let him die, either, but something where Zod's own recklessness causes his demise and Superman is unable to stop it, for whatever reason. Superman is supposed to be the ideal. He's the one we look up to. The one we strive to be. He's supposed to be better than us. A normal person with the kind of power Superman has would abuse it. What makes Superman such a great hero is the fact that he doesn't. That's what we look up to. That's what we admire. But now he's just a murderer, like us, (humans in general, that is). And I'll give this movie credit for at least acknowledging that it was wrong. Superman shows true remorse for killing Zod, which is more than we get from most superheroes. That would be fine if this was the "end" of the film. If this was the lasting impression, then I'd be a little more OK with it. I still wouldn't like that Superman murdered Zod, but at least if I walk out thinking he feels like shit for it, I can deal with it. Instead we get treated to seven more scenes of Clark Kent doing Clark Kent stuff and going on about his business like none of it matters. So whatever emotional impact could have been gained from Superman showing remorse right after the murder, is lost in the ensuing rush of "hilarious" gags, making it pointless and meaningless and leaving me with the impression that he wasn't that remorseful after all.
-Speaking of those endings, Perry knows that Clark is Superman, right? Because he just hired this dude and threw him in the bullpen with his two best reporters (Lois Lane and dude whose name was said once but I don't remember it and it doesn't matter because he's still the only other reporter we see at the Daily Planet). Now it didn't look like Clark had gone to get his Journalism degree in those flashbacks we kept getting, so as far as I know, he has ZERO journalistic experience or training and just got thrown right into a partnership (or whatever) with a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist. That would be quite the accomplishment for even a seasoned journalist, let alone some dude whose last job was as a crab fisherman... even though that's not on his resume because he was using a fake name. So does Clark even have job experience on his resume? Not like he can claim to have worked at all those places if he didn't give them his real name. Not that crab fishing lends well to a job as a reporter, either, but at least it would be something... Ugh. So, either Perry knows that Clark is Superman and he's helping him out, or he's the most incompetent editor/manager/hiring personnel on the planet.
-Smallville got fuuuuuuuucked up.
-Metropolis got fuuuuuuuucked up.
-That tweet. There've been talks that Man of Steel opens the door to the larger DCU. Other people with super powers see Superman "come out" and then find the courage to take up after him. So that's how we end up getting The Flash and Wonder Woman? It isn't clear, and a lot of it is just shit that the writer and director of Man of Steel talked about wanting to do, but I think that's as far as it goes. Nothing official, just some hopeful dudes wanting to do more. With that idea, though, I think it would be cool to see this as Luthor's motivation for hating Superman. Sure, Zod caused a lot of that damage to Metropolis, but he was there to find Superman to begin with. And Smallville was all Superman smashing shit. The movie was quite clear that Superman does not care about collateral damage because smashing through crumbling buildings looks fucking cool. I'm sorta OK with that, because it DOES look cool. But it would be so awesome if Lex Luthor looked at that and said "This is a dangerous man that must be stopped." And then he tries to do that. Sure, he's a villain, so he'll do it in a villainous manner, but the core idea that he wants to keep Superman from ruining another American city is solid. And even if we want to accept the argument that all those people made it out of the buildings safe and sound... that's still millions of dollars in property damage. Those are homes and businesses that have been obliterated, and I doubt insurance covers "alien brawl." So Luthor has a solid foundation to stand on. Then it's just a matter of making him take it "too far."
I had a friend who said he preferred Iron Man 3 to Man of Steel and I think I felt the opposite, which is weird because I don't much care for Superman. That could have something to do with it, though. I was much more invested in Iron Man 3 than I was in Man of Steel, so it's possible that the inconsistencies of the former would bother me more than the latter. Perhaps.
And now, bullet points... (sorta)
-It's too damn long. There had to be some edits that could have gotten this down closer to two hours. The problem with the final fight was that we all knew it was coming. Of course it was. That's how these movies are structured. Prolonging the fight or doing some half-assed fake out is pointless. We all know Superman vs Zod is going to close out the show. The longer the movie goes on, the less we care and the more we just want to see the thing we know is coming. Other downside to a Superman movie is that Superman fights tend to be more or less the same thing. Packing in a couple long ass fights gives us a chance to see a lot of cool stuff, but it also gives us more chances to see a lot of the same stuff (that stuff being punching). The fight in Smallville could have been trimmed down a couple of minutes, at least, and still had the same essential effect. Well, most of the fights. Superman vs the World Engine. The struggle to turn on the escape pod so it could be used as a bomb. All of these things could have been trimmed, and we would have gotten the exact same movie with less "cool" stuff in it.
-Speaking of Zod, Michael Shannon seemed a lot less evil than I expected. Though I get that his character wasn't "evil," at least not from a certain point of view, but he was the antagonist. He was ruthless, and I expected more overall menace from him. Seemed like three-quarters of the time he was just going with the flow, not all that interested, and then the other quarter he cranks up the Insane-O-Meter to a rockin' 11. Those parts are awesome. The other parts were kinda dull.
-Jor-El was a badass. This is not a bad thing. But after that opening, I did kinda hope it was just going to be a whole movie of Jor-El kicking ass on Krypton.
-Lois should have kissed Superman. It doesn't seem to make sense for Supers to lead into it, too. I'm all for him joining in if she initiates, but it seemed weird for him to make the move first, or for them to do it at the same time, as he hadn't seemed too interested before that. There were a couple of spots, but most of the movie was Lois Lane being all school girl crush on the hot quarterback. Superman was... preoccupied. And it didn't seem like Clark had spent a lot of time with the ladies in his travels, so I'm guessing he's not all that suave or smooth. Just seems far more plausible that a strong, independent woman like Lois would make the first move and then Superman would be like, "This is cool" and join in.
-I liked this Lois Lane. Aside from Jor-El, she seemed to be the most interesting person in the movie. Up until closer to the end when she just turned into helpless woman falling out of an airplane.
-The ending. Gods damn this ending. Despite some minor grips, I was on board with this one until the end. It was more or less the movie I expected, and that's a good thing. It wasn't disappointing. Until the end. I bitched about this with Iron Man 3, and I'm going to again here... superheroes need to stop murdering people. It's fine for Wolverine and Punisher because that's what those dudes do. It's part of their schtick. And it serves a purpose, to some degree, of informing their character and their motivations. This is not true for most superheroes, who tend to avoid murdering villains because it's crossing a line into villainous terrain. Murder is wrong. We all know that. Now this isn't Superman's fault. He was written into a corner. But there were still other options. Superman could have blocked Zod's heat vision with his own hand. Or could have flown them both up into space or some remote area of the world where innocent victims would not be an issue. He could have even just turned Zod's head to redirect the heat vision, as opposed to turning it 360 degrees to snap his gods damn neck. Even within the scene itself, there were other options. But that scene didn't have to happen. There were an infinite numbers of possibilities for an ending to this movie. And even if Zod had to die, there could have been the self-inflicted death (ala Green Goblin in the first Raimi Spider-Man movie) or something akin to Liam Neeson's death in Batman Begins. Not that Superman should have let him die, either, but something where Zod's own recklessness causes his demise and Superman is unable to stop it, for whatever reason. Superman is supposed to be the ideal. He's the one we look up to. The one we strive to be. He's supposed to be better than us. A normal person with the kind of power Superman has would abuse it. What makes Superman such a great hero is the fact that he doesn't. That's what we look up to. That's what we admire. But now he's just a murderer, like us, (humans in general, that is). And I'll give this movie credit for at least acknowledging that it was wrong. Superman shows true remorse for killing Zod, which is more than we get from most superheroes. That would be fine if this was the "end" of the film. If this was the lasting impression, then I'd be a little more OK with it. I still wouldn't like that Superman murdered Zod, but at least if I walk out thinking he feels like shit for it, I can deal with it. Instead we get treated to seven more scenes of Clark Kent doing Clark Kent stuff and going on about his business like none of it matters. So whatever emotional impact could have been gained from Superman showing remorse right after the murder, is lost in the ensuing rush of "hilarious" gags, making it pointless and meaningless and leaving me with the impression that he wasn't that remorseful after all.
-Speaking of those endings, Perry knows that Clark is Superman, right? Because he just hired this dude and threw him in the bullpen with his two best reporters (Lois Lane and dude whose name was said once but I don't remember it and it doesn't matter because he's still the only other reporter we see at the Daily Planet). Now it didn't look like Clark had gone to get his Journalism degree in those flashbacks we kept getting, so as far as I know, he has ZERO journalistic experience or training and just got thrown right into a partnership (or whatever) with a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist. That would be quite the accomplishment for even a seasoned journalist, let alone some dude whose last job was as a crab fisherman... even though that's not on his resume because he was using a fake name. So does Clark even have job experience on his resume? Not like he can claim to have worked at all those places if he didn't give them his real name. Not that crab fishing lends well to a job as a reporter, either, but at least it would be something... Ugh. So, either Perry knows that Clark is Superman and he's helping him out, or he's the most incompetent editor/manager/hiring personnel on the planet.
-Smallville got fuuuuuuuucked up.
-Metropolis got fuuuuuuuucked up.
-That tweet. There've been talks that Man of Steel opens the door to the larger DCU. Other people with super powers see Superman "come out" and then find the courage to take up after him. So that's how we end up getting The Flash and Wonder Woman? It isn't clear, and a lot of it is just shit that the writer and director of Man of Steel talked about wanting to do, but I think that's as far as it goes. Nothing official, just some hopeful dudes wanting to do more. With that idea, though, I think it would be cool to see this as Luthor's motivation for hating Superman. Sure, Zod caused a lot of that damage to Metropolis, but he was there to find Superman to begin with. And Smallville was all Superman smashing shit. The movie was quite clear that Superman does not care about collateral damage because smashing through crumbling buildings looks fucking cool. I'm sorta OK with that, because it DOES look cool. But it would be so awesome if Lex Luthor looked at that and said "This is a dangerous man that must be stopped." And then he tries to do that. Sure, he's a villain, so he'll do it in a villainous manner, but the core idea that he wants to keep Superman from ruining another American city is solid. And even if we want to accept the argument that all those people made it out of the buildings safe and sound... that's still millions of dollars in property damage. Those are homes and businesses that have been obliterated, and I doubt insurance covers "alien brawl." So Luthor has a solid foundation to stand on. Then it's just a matter of making him take it "too far."
